Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 264 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 27 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 74 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Hyundai Kona is smaller. Hyundai Kona is 41 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Hyundai Kona has 45 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 372 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda CR-V scores higher in safety tests, butHyundai Kona is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda CR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |