Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 264 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Hyundai Kona engine produces 27 HP more power than Skoda Kamiq, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Kamiq engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Kona might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Skoda Kamiq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Kamiq, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | no data | |
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Kona has 144 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Kamiq. The Skoda Kamiq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Skoda Kamiq scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Kamiq scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 400 | 19 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |