Hyundai Kona 2018 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Hyundai Kona) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Captur) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 60 HP more power than Renault Captur, but torque is 41 NM less than Renault Captur. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Kona engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1297 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Kona has 89 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 62 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`805 kg | 1`759 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`311 kg | 1`204 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 494 kg | 555 kg | |
| Hyundai Kona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Renault Captur. Therefore, Renault Captur is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Renault Captur has
| |