Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona engine produces 94 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.4 | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Hyundai Kona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Kona gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Kona engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona and Nissan Juke are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 207 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 786 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Kona has 154 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 357 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |