Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Kona consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Hyundai Kona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Kona consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Juke engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Kona engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 797 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Kona has 146 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 346 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |