Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2020

 
Hyundai Kona
2017 -
Nissan Juke
2020 -
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 120 HP114 HP
Torque: 172 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds11.8 seconds
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving.
Hyundai Kona engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 28 NM less than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.35.0
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Hyundai Kona consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres46 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 300'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 9 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20Used also on Nissan Micra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Kona might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.21 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.55 m1.60 m
Hyundai Kona is 5 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 361 litres422 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1143 litres1305 litres
Nissan Juke has more luggage space.
Hyundai Kona has 61 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 162 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`725
Safety:
Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 19 20019 600
Pros and Cons: Hyundai Kona has
Nissan Juke has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv