Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 8 NM less than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Kona might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 422 litres | |
| Hyundai Kona has 7 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 721 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |
