Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Seat Arona 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona engine produces 5 HP more power than Seat Arona, but torque is 28 NM less than Seat Arona. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai Kona consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Kona consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Arona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Arona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 3 cm longer than the Seat Arona, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1280 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Hyundai Kona has 39 litres less trunk space than the Seat Arona. This could mean that the Hyundai Kona uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Arona has
| |