Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Kona is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Kona engine produces 38 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Kona consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Kona engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Hyundai Kona is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Kona and Peugeot 2008 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1194 litres | |
| Hyundai Kona has 11 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`582 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Peugeot 2008 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |