Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.2 | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Hyundai Kona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai Kona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai Kona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Hyundai Kona 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
| Hyundai Kona is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Kona has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 117 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`692 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |