Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Hyundai Kona and Hyundai i30 have the same engine power, but Hyundai Kona torque is 1 NM more than Hyundai i30. Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Kona consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Kona consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai Kona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai Kona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Hyundai Kona 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
| Hyundai Kona is 18 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 395 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1301 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Hyundai Kona has 34 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Hyundai i30 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |