Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Citroen C3 Aircross 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 Aircross is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Kona and Citroen C3 Aircross have the same engine power, but Hyundai Kona torque is 128 NM less than Citroen C3 Aircross. Hyundai Kona reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.0 | |
|
The Citroen C3 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Kona consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Aircross, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Kona could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C3 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C3 Aircross engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Insignia, Citroen C4 Cactus, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Kona might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Hyundai Kona is larger, but lower. Hyundai Kona is 1 cm longer than the Citroen C3 Aircross, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 361 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1143 litres | 1289 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 Aircross has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Hyundai Kona has 49 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3 Aircross. This could mean that the Hyundai Kona uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Aircross (by 146 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Citroen C3 Aircross has
| |