Hyundai Kona 2020 vs Skoda Kamiq 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Hyundai Kona is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Kamiq can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, electric) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Hyundai Kona is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 280 HP | 95 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 - 395 NM | 150 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 - 11.9 seconds | 9.9 - 13.8 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai Kona are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Kamiq. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 6.1 | 4.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Hyundai Kona petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Kamiq. On average, Hyundai Kona equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 - 170 mm (6.2 - 6.7 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kamiq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 7 cm shorter than the Skoda Kamiq, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1297 litres | 1510 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Skoda Kamiq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kamiq (by 213 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`915 kg | ~ 1`668 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`433 kg | ~ 1`235 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 482 kg | ~ 433 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |