Hyundai Kona 2020 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2023
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Hyundai Kona is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, electric) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi ASX is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 280 HP | 91 - 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 - 395 NM | 144 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 - 11.9 seconds | 8.5 - 14 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai Kona are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi ASX. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 6.1 | 1.4 - 6.2 | |
|
Hyundai Kona petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 - 170 mm (6.2 - 6.7 inches) | 166 - 174 mm (6.5 - 6.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1297 litres | 1275 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`915 kg | ~ 1`865 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`433 kg | ~ 1`385 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 482 kg | ~ 480 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |