Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Skoda Scala 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Hyundai Kona is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Scala can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 43 - 177 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 - 320 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 12 seconds | 8.2 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 7.3 | 4.1 - 5.0 | |
|
Hyundai Kona petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Scala. On average, Hyundai Kona equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.47 m | |
| Hyundai Kona is 20 cm shorter than the Skoda Scala, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Kona has 77 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Scala. The Skoda Scala may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`879 | ~ 1`730 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Scala scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Scala scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |