Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Seat Arona 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Hyundai Kona is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Seat Arona can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, electric) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Hyundai Kona is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 204 HP | 95 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 - 395 NM | 155 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12 seconds | 8 - 12.8 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai Kona are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Seat Arona. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 7.3 | 3.7 - 6.3 | |
|
Hyundai Kona petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Arona. On average, Hyundai Kona equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 - 177 mm (6.2 - 7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Arona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 3 cm longer than the Seat Arona, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1297 litres | 1280 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Kona has 144 litres more trunk space than the Seat Arona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Arona, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`922 kg | ~ 1`761 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`428 kg | ~ 1`170 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 494 kg | ~ 591 kg | |
| Hyundai Kona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Seat Arona. Therefore, Seat Arona is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Seat Arona has
| |