Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Renault Captur 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Hyundai Kona is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Renault Captur can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, electric) | 0.9 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Hyundai Kona is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 204 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 - 395 NM | 140 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12 seconds | 8.2 - 13.8 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai Kona are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Captur. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 7.3 | 3.6 - 5.6 | |
|
Hyundai Kona petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Captur. On average, Hyundai Kona equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 - 177 mm (6.2 - 7 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Kona is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Kona is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1297 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Kona has 89 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 62 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`922 kg | ~ 1`731 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`428 kg | ~ 1`185 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 494 kg | ~ 546 kg | |
| Hyundai Kona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Renault Captur. Therefore, Renault Captur is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Renault Captur has
| |