Hyundai Kona 2017 vs Hyundai i30 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Hyundai Kona is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Hyundai i30 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 43 - 177 HP | 100 - 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 - 320 NM | 134 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 12 seconds | 6.1 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 7.3 | 3.4 - 5.2 | |
|
Hyundai Kona petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i30. On average, Hyundai Kona equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 - 177 mm (6.7 - 7 inches) | 135 - 140 mm (5.3 - 5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai Kona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
| Hyundai Kona is 18 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Kona is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 395 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1301 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Kona has 149 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The Hyundai i30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Kona is 1 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Hyundai Kona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`879 | ~ 1`865 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Hyundai i30 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Kona has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |