Hyundai H1 1998 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 21.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai H1 engine produces 60 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Hyundai H1 reaches 100 km/h speed 11 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 6.5 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai H1 consumes 7.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai H1 could require 1140 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Galaxy) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Hyundai H1 is smaller, but higher. Hyundai H1 is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai H1 is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 364 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3295 litres | 2325 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai H1 (by 970 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`550 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`845 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 705 kg | 770 kg | |
| Hyundai H1 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai H1 has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |