Hyundai H1 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Hyundai H1 engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Sharan) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Volkswagen Sharan 2000 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.88 m | 1.73 m | |
Hyundai H1 is larger. Hyundai H1 is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai H1 is 15 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai H1 has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |