Hyundai Getz 2002 vs Audi A2 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Audi A2 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 5 HP less power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Audi A2. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Audi A2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Getz consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Getz could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Audi A2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Bora | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi A2 2004 1.6 engine: The intake system in this engine is highly complex, with numerous sensors prone to malfunctions. The only effective solution is to replace them when issues arise.
This engine is also highly sensitive to ... More about Audi A2 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Hyundai Getz is smaller. Hyundai Getz is 2 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Hyundai Getz has 136 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 108 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A2, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Audi A2 has
| |