Hyundai Getz 2002 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Getz engine produces 45 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Getz could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Getz consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.42 m | |
| Hyundai Getz and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Hyundai Getz has 1 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 5.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Renault Clio has
| |