Hyundai Getz 2002 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Getz engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Getz could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Getz consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.42 m | |
| Hyundai Getz and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Hyundai Getz has 256 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Renault Clio has
| |