Hyundai Getz 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 13 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Getz consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Getz could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Hyundai Getz and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Getz has 34 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |