Hyundai Getz 2002 vs Audi A2 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 62 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 96 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Audi A2 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 13 HP less power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi A2. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A2 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that by driving the Hyundai Getz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Getz consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Atos | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi A2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Hyundai Getz is smaller. Hyundai Getz is 2 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Hyundai Getz has 136 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 108 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`420 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A2, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Audi A2 has
| |