Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 44 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Hyundai Getz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Getz consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Getz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
| Hyundai Getz and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Getz has 99 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |