Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Hyundai Getz engine produces 3 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite less power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Hyundai Getz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Getz consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Hyundai Getz is smaller. Hyundai Getz is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Getz has 34 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |