Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Hyundai Getz) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Suzuki Swift) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 14 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 82 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Hyundai Getz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Getz consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Getz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Hyundai Matrix | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Hyundai Getz is 13 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Getz has 41 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Hyundai Getz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |