Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 5 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Hyundai Getz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Getz consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Hyundai Getz is smaller. Hyundai Getz is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Getz has 34 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |