Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 5 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Getz could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Getz consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Hyundai Getz is 13 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 562 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Getz has 41 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 415 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Hyundai Getz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`420 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |