Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Getz engine produces 22 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Getz could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Getz consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Hyundai Getz is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Getz has 99 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |