Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 26 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Hyundai Getz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Getz consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Getz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Picanto, Hyundai i10 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.54 m | |
| Hyundai Getz is 12 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 198 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Getz has 56 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Hyundai Getz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |