Hyundai Getz 2002 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Getz engine produces 3 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Getz could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Getz consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Hyundai Getz is 12 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 562 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Getz has 41 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 415 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Hyundai Getz can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |