Hyundai Getz 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 2 HP more power than Renault Clio, but torque is 1 NM less than Renault Clio. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Getz consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Getz could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Matrix | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.42 m | |
| Hyundai Getz and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 1037 litres | |
| Hyundai Getz has 1 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 60 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.6/10 | 5.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Renault Clio has
| |