Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 21 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Getz consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Hyundai Getz over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Getz consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Getz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Hyundai Matrix | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Getz is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Getz has 34 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |