Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Getz engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Getz reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Getz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Picanto, Hyundai i10 | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Getz is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Getz has 34 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |