Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 - 106 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 - 215 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15.6 seconds | 8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.0 | 4.4 - 6.8 | |
|
Hyundai Getz petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Hyundai Getz equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Hyundai Getz is smaller. Hyundai Getz is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | 760 litres | |
| Hyundai Getz has 246 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`472 | ~ 1`497 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |