Hyundai Getz 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 - 106 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 - 215 NM | 100 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15.6 seconds | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.0 | 5.5 - 6.1 | |
|
Hyundai Getz petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Getz is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Getz is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 254 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
977 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Getz has 34 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Getz is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai Getz can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`494 | ~ 1`439 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Getz has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |