Hyundai Galloper 1998 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 25.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Hyundai Galloper engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 30 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.57 m | |
Hyundai Galloper is larger. Hyundai Galloper is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 12 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Galloper is 32 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 2`835 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |