Hyundai Equus 2013 vs Chrysler 200 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Hyundai Equus is available only with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler 200 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.8 - 5.0 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 334 - 430 HP | 187 - 300 HP | |
Torque: | 395 - 510 NM | 234 - 355 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 6.9 seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 12.3 | 8.5 - 10.2 | |
Hyundai Equus petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.16 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
Hyundai Equus is larger. Hyundai Equus is 28 cm longer than the Chrysler 200, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 474 litres | 463 litres | |
Hyundai Equus has 11 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Equus is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Hyundai Equus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`465 | ~ 2`141 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Equus has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |