Hyundai Equus 1999 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 4.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 - 270 HP | 203 - 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 - 381 NM | 258 - 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 - 13.5 | 10.1 - 10.8 | |
|
Hyundai Equus petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Concorde. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Hyundai Equus is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Equus is 22 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Equus is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage space. Hyundai Equus has 25 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Concorde. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`128 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |