Hyundai Eon 2011 vs Toyota Aygo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.8 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 56 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 75 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Eon engine produces 13 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Eon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 3.8 | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Eon consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Eon could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 32 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.55 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Hyundai Eon is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Eon is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 168 litres | |
|
Hyundai Eon has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Eon has 47 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Eon is 1.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Hyundai Eon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Eon has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |