Hyundai Elantra 2000 vs Kia Shuma 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai Elantra engine produces 6 HP more power than Kia Shuma, but torque is 2 NM less than Kia Shuma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Cerato, Kia Carens | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Elantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Elantra is 1 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Shuma has more luggage space. Hyundai Elantra has 25 litres less trunk space than the Kia Shuma. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Elantra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Elantra has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |