Hyundai Elantra 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Elantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Elantra engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Hyundai Elantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Elantra consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Elantra could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Elantra consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota C-HR engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Elantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Elantra 2019 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Hyundai Elantra is larger, but lower. Hyundai Elantra is 26 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Elantra is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 377 litres | |
|
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Elantra has 81 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Elantra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Hyundai Elantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Elantra has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |