Hyundai Elantra 2000 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 141 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Hyundai Elantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Elantra engine produces 39 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Hyundai Elantra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.0 | |
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Elantra consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Elantra could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Toledo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Elantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Hyundai Elantra 2000 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Elantra 2000 2.0 engine Skoda Octavia 2000 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Skoda Octavia 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Elantra is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Elantra is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 528 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 1328 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Hyundai Elantra has 113 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 106 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Elantra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Hyundai Elantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Elantra has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Elantra has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |