Hyundai Elantra 2003 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Elantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Elantra engine produces 37 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Hyundai Elantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 10.3 | |
|
The Hyundai Elantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Elantra consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that by driving the Hyundai Elantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 430 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Elantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Elantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Elantra 2003 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Elantra 2003 2.0 engine Chevrolet Aveo 2003 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality. Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Aveo 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Hyundai Elantra is larger, but lower. Hyundai Elantra is 64 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Elantra is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 175 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | 980 litres | |
|
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Elantra has 240 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Elantra (by 242 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Elantra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Elantra has
|
| |