Hyundai Elantra 2003 vs Seat Toledo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Elantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Elantra engine produces 3 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 5 NM less than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Hyundai Elantra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Elantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Elantra consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Hyundai Elantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Elantra consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Elantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Touran, Volkswagen Caddy, Seat Altea | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Elantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.57 m | |
| Hyundai Elantra is 6 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Elantra is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Elantra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Hyundai Elantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Elantra has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Elantra has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |