Hyundai Elantra 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 128 - 149 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
Torque: | 155 - 212 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.6 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 7.2 | 3.8 - 8.1 | |
Hyundai Elantra petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Elantra is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 419 litres | |
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Elantra has 39 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`790 | ~ 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Elantra has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |