Hyundai Coupe 1996 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Coupe is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Coupe engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 38 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Hyundai Coupe reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Coupe is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Coupe consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Hyundai Coupe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Coupe consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Lantra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Coupe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Hyundai Coupe is smaller. Hyundai Coupe is 30 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Coupe is 41 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
362 litres | 930 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 568 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Coupe is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Hyundai Coupe can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Coupe has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |