Hyundai Coupe 1999 vs Toyota Celica 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Coupe engine produces 4 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Coupe reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.7 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Coupe consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Coupe could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Coupe engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Lantra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Coupe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Coupe and Toyota Celica are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
362 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Coupe is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Hyundai Coupe can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Coupe has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |